Creation of a virtual patient for application in medical student education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15343/0104-7809.202650e19472025IKeywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Patient Simulation, Teaching, Medical Education, DiagnosisAbstract
The clinical examination remains a cornerstone of medical training; however, the expansion of medical schools and structural limitations have reduced practical opportunities, favoring the use of active methodologies and virtual patients based on artificial intelligence (AI). This study aimed to develop an original AI-based virtual patient (VP) and evaluate its acceptance and applicability as a complementary tool for teaching medical semiology. This was an exploratory and experimental study with a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach, approved by an Ethics Committee, involving medical students who had completed Semiology I. The project was conducted in two stages: creation of a pilot VP using the ChatGPT API, grounded in updated clinical guidelines; and development of the original VP (SimHarvey) on its own platform. The methodological approach consisted of a nine-item Likert questionnaire assessment, with descriptive and non parametric inferential statistical analyses. A total of 118 students participated, with high tool acceptance and means above 4.0/5.0 for satisfaction, utility in clinical examination training, learning, confidence, and recommendation. No significant differences were found regarding sex or academic stage, and the overall perception was significantly above the neutral point (p<0.001). The findings indicated that the AI-based VP favored clinical reasoning, anamnesis organization, and the simulation of diverse clinical scenarios, corroborating the literature on virtual patients as effective and accessible educational strategies. SimHarvey proved to be a low-cost, well-accepted tool with relevant potential to complement medical training, without replacing real clinical practice, being especially useful in contexts with structural constraints.
Downloads
Translation
References
Porto CC. Semiologia Médica. 8. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2019.
Scheffer M, et al. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2020. São Paulo: FMUSP, CFM; 2020. Disponível em: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/ pt/biblio-1436680 Acesso em: 27 jun. 2026.
Suárez A, Adanero A, Díaz-Flores García V, Freire Y, Algar J. Using a Virtual Patient via an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Develop Dental Students’ Diagnostic Skills. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 18;19(14):8735. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148735.
Santos ECN, Almeida RG, Meska MHG, Mazzo A. Paciente simulado versus simulador de alta fidelidade: satisfação, autoconfiança e conhecimento entre estudantes de enfermagem no Brasil. Cogitare Enferm. 2021;26:e76730. DOI: 10.5380/ce.v26i0.76730.
Mantas J, et al. Recommendations of the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) on Education in Biomedical and Health Informatics: First Revision. Methods Inf Med. 2010 Jan 7;49(2):105-20. DOI: 10.3414/ME5119.
Kononowicz AA, et al. Virtual Patient Simulations in Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 2;21(7):e14676. DOI: 10.2196/14676.
OpenAI. ChatGPT [software]. Versão GPT-5. San Francisco: OpenAI; 2025. Disponível em: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference Acesso em: 27 jun. 2026.
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia; Sociedade Brasileira de Hipertensão; Sociedade Brasileira de Nefrologia. Diretriz Brasileira de Hipertensão Arterial – 2025. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025;122(9):e20250624. Disponível em: https://cremal.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Diretriz_ Hipertensao_2025_SBC_Melhor ado.pdf Acesso em: 27 jun. 2026.
Dalgalarrondo P. Psicopatologia e semiologia dos transtornos mentais. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2019.
Tureck F, Souza S, Faria RMD. Estratégias de ensino do raciocínio clínico nos cursos de Medicina do Brasil - revisão integrativa. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2023;47(1):e017. DOI: 10.1590/1981-5271v47.1-20220032.
Knobel R, Costa RR. Confecção e uso de simuladores de baixo custo: experiências da medicina e enfermagem. In: Tarcia RM, organizadora. Simulação em saúde para ensino e avaliação. Brasília: ABEM; 2021. p. 119–127.
Rodrigues ND, Nunes LMA, Magno LMS, Daher IC, Rodrigues NFD. O impacto das simulações realísticas com pacientes virtuais na formação dos alunos de medicina do CESUPA. Res Soc Dev. 2023 Aug 24;12(8):e12412842981. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i8.42981.
Zeferino AMB, Domingues RCL, Amaral E. Feedback como estratégia de aprendizado no ensino médico. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2007;31(2):176–9. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-55022007000200009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 O Mundo da Saúde

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




























